[identity profile] littlerdog.livejournal.com
I reached page 86 of Cloud Atlas and that seemed a good place to pause and consider whether I wanted to go on, as the Frobisher sequence had ended and another new sequence was about to begin. It was with very little difficulty that I decided I had no wish to continue. Frankly, I was finding the book dull.

As was blindingly obvious, Frobisher stole from his host and patron. As was painfully predictable, he also started having sex with Mrs host and patron. It's like Birdsong all over again. I find it ironic that I mentioned Birdsong in my first post on this book and that the word 'birdsong' actually appears in a section dealing with this tedious interaction between the two. Is this kind of story so very common? Do people really enjoy reading it that much? I wasn't enjoying reading it at all. And eh, when a character has sex with anyone who asks, whether for pleasure or for money, it's not all that interesting. There's no conflict, no sparring, no negotiations, nothing for the reader to savour. Boring.

Still no sfnal elements. I've seen authors pulverised by critiquers for not hinting at the SFFy bits on page one. But by page 86 you'd expect a glimpse or two. Nope. Nothing.

Where the book is successful is that the first person narrative by Ewing is nothing like that by Frobisher. The distinct voices are very successful. Unlike in, say, The Historian, or The Time-Traveller's Wife, you don't need to be reminded every five minutes that the narrator has changed. So that aspect of the book is in fact excellent. In the absence of any other excellent aspects, however, it wasn't enough to keep me reading. Alas.
[identity profile] littlerdog.livejournal.com
The current read is David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas and OHMYGOD it's boring.

At least, the opening segment, the extract from Adam Ewing's diary, bored me almost to tears. I read it through wondering why I was reading it, why it mattered, why I should care. Things picked up a bit with Frobisher's letters, although I gather he's supposed to be a charming chancer that I'm meant to care about, and again I wonder why I should. He particularly annoyed me with his pretence that he was seeking employment with the composer Ayrs in order to help the man out, when it was obvious he intended stealing from the poor man. This charming chancer even lies to himself.

This is often a problem I have with books, I won't say especially books by men (although it is especially books by men), where I'm presented with a deeply unpleasant character (viz the narrator in Faulks's Birdsong) whose unpleasantness I'm either supposed not to notice, or to admire. The 'loveable rogue' isn't loveable to me; it's an archetype I've never liked.

Eh.

Not seen anything yet of the purported sfnal elements, either. It's a big thick book, too. But I shall persevere a little and see if it improves.

Profile

The Little Dog Laughed

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 02:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios